Tuesday, August 26, 2008

While the criteria for this blog is to “reflect on anything in this class so far” and I am inclined to respond to the statement that JP knows everything about prostitutes, I feel it is probably a better idea to talk about discussion and our conclusion that true reality may exist and can be shared with other’s by telling stories. While I do not contest this statement as inherently true, I would like to point out that it is another imperfect way of expression. If stories are our best way to relate our realities together, we fail generally to succeed in giving others good insights at all. Firstly, most if not all stories are embellished and changed by the subconscious as well as the conscious. Secondly, we are not capable of explaining true emotions with words or descriptions to any extent comparable to actual experience. Even poetry, which is arguably the best way to connect feelings and emotions with a reader or observer, does not succeed in portraying reality closely. If you disagree, think of the last time you told a story and then said at the end, “you had to be there to understand.” Stories are our best way to relate realities, however they remain woefully incapable of doing so. 

2 Comments:

At September 1, 2008 at 9:55 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yes - and I never said they were completely careful - only that they are the only possible habitation we have for conveying reality.

 
At September 2, 2008 at 3:37 PM , Blogger JD said...

I agree with your statements, but i felt you could have elaborated further on the imperfection of expression to others. Often stories and other forms of expression work just as well as intended, and occasionally, like you said, you are forced to say "you had to be there." Sometimes, however, languages shortcomings and the stories powerful nature are not the only variables. A story's purpose is to find a half-way point with the listener, in the hopes that they too will understand exactly what happened. Because of this, the stories effectivity or lack of effectivity can vary entirely on the audience. For example, a thief could tell his friends and fellow larceners of his barely foiled attempt to rob the bank and receive gratuitous sympathy, while a bank teller could hear the same story and mock him in disgust.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home